Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, having a overall score of 88.5 against 82.2. Even when the Galaxy Z Flip and the Xiaomi Mi 9T were released only 8 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, so it gives lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit less pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T has a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a camera with way more MP.
Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.