Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a score of 85.6, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's 82.2 overall score. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is noticeably newer, a little bit lighter and way thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a little lower pixels count in each inch of screen, a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display.
Xiaomi Mi 9T captures way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also has a camera with way more MP. Galaxy Z Flip 3 and Xiaomi Mi 9T feature quite similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.