Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, having a 92.3 score against 82.2. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has the newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's construction is newer, a little bit lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.