Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's 82.2 general score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is newer and extremely thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's, but it's also extremely heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a newer 11 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10, giving you a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi 9T features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality pictures and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.