Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-06-17 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi 9T's 82.2 overall score. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner than Xiaomi Mi 9T's, but it's noticeably heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, giving you lots of additional features.
Xiaomi Mi 9T features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 9T features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture for better photos and video in low light environments and a lot higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.