Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-06-17 | -- |
| 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue | Black Shadow |
| Metal and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is much better than Xiaomi Mi 9T, getting a general score of 91.1 against 82.2. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a somewhat heavier but thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Mi 9T.
Xiaomi Mi 9T has a much better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a higher 1968 x 2184px resolution, a bigger screen and a way brighter display.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 9T shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels, they both have the same aperture.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.