Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.12 x 2.98 x 0.29 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Mi A1's 75 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Xiaomi Mi A1. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi A1 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi A1, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with way more brightness, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bigger display. The Xiaomi Mi A1 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi A1, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way bigger aperture and a camera with a way higher resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A1, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.