Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.12 x 2.98 x 0.29 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi A1's score of 75. Galaxy F62's body is notably newer than Xiaomi Mi A1's, but it's noticeably thicker and way heavier. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy F62 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Mi A1 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A1, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi A1 and Galaxy F62 both feature very similar displays, because although the Galaxy F62 has a little bit darker display and a just a little lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy F62 takes greater videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi A1, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger aperture for better low light photography and a way more mega pixels camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB and more internal memory.
The Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has a 127 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.