Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.12 x 2.98 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi A1, with an 80.1 score against 75. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's construction is much newer, but extremely heavier and much thicker than Xiaomi Mi A1. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the older 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Mi A1 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi A1. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi A1, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen density.
Xiaomi Mi A1 features a superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Mi A1 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A1, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has a 46% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.