Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.12 x 2.98 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Black |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi A1, with a global score of 81 against 75. Although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is extremely newer than Xiaomi Mi A1, it's noticeably heavier and a lot thicker. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi A1 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Xiaomi Mi A1 counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920px, a little bit smaller display and a little bit lower pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A1. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi A1, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a lot larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A1, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro has superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.