Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.12 x 2.98 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is better than Xiaomi Mi A1, with a score of 85.6 against 75. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi A1 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 construction is newer and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Mi A1's, although it's also just a little bit heavier.
Xiaomi Mi A1 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite inferior pixel count in each inch in the screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi A1 has a slightly better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi A1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM. Xiaomi Mi A1 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting images and videos in low-light environments, they both have a same resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.