Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-12 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.12 x 2.98 x 0.29 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Pink | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3080mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way better than Xiaomi Mi A1, getting a 90.6 score against 75. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi A1 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 construction is incredibly newer and thinner, but heavier than the Xiaomi Mi A1.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A1, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi A1 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A1, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A1, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3080mAh.
The Xiaomi Mi A1 features a lot better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3. Both of them have the same resolution camera and a F2.2 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.