Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-27 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's global score of 74.3. Although the Apple iPhone X and Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite were released with only 9 months difference, the Apple iPhone X is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner. Apple iPhone X features a faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has less cpu cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone X counts with a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have a same size screen, the iPhone X also has a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution, a quite higher display pixels density and a little bit more brightness. The iPhone X captures much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have a 12 MP camera in the back, the iPhone X also has a larger aperture and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Apple iPhone X has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite counts with a way better battery performance than iPhone X, because it has a 47% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.