Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's 74.3 score. Google Pixel 3's body is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, even though they were released only a couple months apart. Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite features a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite larger display. Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a camera in the back with more megapixels, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.