Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-27 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's global score of 74.3. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Google Pixel 3a's construction is newer, a little bit thinner and lighter than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite.
The Google Pixel 3a has a processor that's just as good as the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite one, both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2280px resolution.
Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.