Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-27 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, having a global score of 78.9 against 74.3. The Google Pixel 3a XL design is newer, a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a XL has older 11 version while Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite and the Google Pixel 3a XL both feature similar processors, they have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
Google Pixel 3a XL captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos, a camera with a higher resolution and a lot better video definition. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an 8% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.