Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, having a global score of 81.9 against 74.3. The Google Pixel 4 is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite. Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little lower pixel number per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Google Pixel 4 has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4 has a better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a back-facing camera with more mega pixels, a lot bigger aperture and a way higher (4K) video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.