Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-07-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's 74.3 score. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a bit bigger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite features just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8% more battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 XL shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a more MP camera, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a way bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.