Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is much better than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, getting an 82.9 score against 74.3. Google Pixel 4a is a notably newer device, and it is also lighter and a little thinner than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite counts with a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a just a little lower screen density and a quite lower 1080 x 2280px resolution, they both have a screen with the same size. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite features a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Google Pixel 4a features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a features a better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a lot larger aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments, a lot better video quality and a camera with more mega pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has greater battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.