Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, having a overall score of 87.5 against 74.3. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer, just a little thinner and just a little lighter than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each screen inch.
Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a back facing camera with a better 12.2 MP resolution, a way larger aperture for better photography and video in poorly lited situations and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.