Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, getting a general score of 87.1 against 74.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a little heavier cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, but they are equally thin.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel number per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way brighter display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a very superior camera than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a much more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way higher (4K) video definition and a way bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a little better battery life than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.