Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, getting a global score of 98 against 74.3. Even though Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is newer than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version while Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a just a little higher display density. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a camera in the back with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.