Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's overall score of 74.3. Although the Galaxy S22 Ultra is way newer than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, it is a little bit thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a way brighter display, a bigger screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.