Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-07-27 | -- |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.28 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and Gold | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has an overall score of 82.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's general score of 74.3. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version while Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo. Galaxy S25's design is notably thinner and noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a much greater performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with way more brightness, a little bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite features a slightly bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB. The Galaxy S25 shoots much better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and video, a much better video definition and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The Galaxy S25 has a battery duration that is very similar to the Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.