Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's 74.3 general score. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version and Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Although Galaxy Z Flip is a little heavier than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, it's somewhat thinner and also newer.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a way better (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.