Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's overall score of 74.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's, but it is also a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher display density.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite features improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a lot higher video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.