Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.88 x 2.82 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gold | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 435 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a lot better than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite's score of 74.3. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way heavier than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, it's incredibly thinner and also newer. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2280px, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels in each inch of display. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 captures better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture to take better photos in low light situations.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A2 Lite, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.