Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-27 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi A2, with a overall score of 78.8 against 78. Google Pixel 3a's construction is newer and lighter, but also just a little thicker than Xiaomi Mi A2. Xiaomi Mi A2 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi A2 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher number of pixels in each display inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi A2 features much more storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory.
Google Pixel 3a's camera is just as good as the Xiaomi Mi A2 one, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a larger camera sensor, they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates. The Xiaomi Mi A2 and the Google Pixel 3a both feature quite similar battery performance, although the Google Pixel 3a has just 3000mAh battery size against 3010mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.