Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-27 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A2 has an overall score of 78, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Xiaomi Mi A2's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released only 15 months before. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a display that's very similar to the display in Xiaomi Mi A2, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a larger aperture for better low light images and video, a lot better video quality, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 66% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.