Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-07-27 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Xiaomi Mi A2, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 78. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Mi A2, but it is also much heavier. The Xiaomi Mi A2 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels count per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold has a much longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 46% larger battery size. Galaxy Fold counts with a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Mi A2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.