Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2018-07-27 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 402 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi A2, getting an 80.1 score against 78. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is newer than Xiaomi Mi A2's, although it is a lot heavier and notably thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi A2, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better battery life than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 50% bigger battery size. Xiaomi Mi A2 captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography and a smaller back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Mi A2 also counts with a much higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.