Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-07-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi A2, getting a overall score of 81 against 78. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the Xiaomi Mi A2, it is a lot thicker and incredibly heavier. Xiaomi Mi A2 and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro have extremely similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a display that's very similar to the Xiaomi Mi A2 one, although the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little larger display and a just a bit greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's camera is just as good as Xiaomi Mi A2's camera, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a way smaller camera sensor taking much lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a much more MP back camera.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.