Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi A3's global score of 79.2. Despite of the fact the Apple iPhone XS is older and a little heavier than Xiaomi Mi A3, it's design is still a little bit thinner. The iPhone XS has a quite superior performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has lesser cores (although they are faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit processor.
IPhone XS counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a lot higher resolution of 1125 x 2436. Xiaomi Mi A3 captures better photographs and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Xiaomi Mi A3 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a way better battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 4030mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.