Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, with an 82.5 score against 79.2. Google Pixel 2 XL is an older and just a little bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Mi A3, but Google managed to make it just a little bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 2 XL has just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A3. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a better screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a much better count of pixels per screen inch. The Xiaomi Mi A3 features much more storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Mi A3 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a back camera with way more megapixels and a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a little better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4030mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.