Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-07-24 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, with a general score of 87.5 against 79.2. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer, just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi A3. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G has a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a better pixel number per inch of display and a little larger screen.
Xiaomi Mi A3 shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Mi A3 has just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.