Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, with an 81.3 score against 79.2. Although LG V35 ThinQ is older than the Xiaomi Mi A3, it's construction is a little bit lighter and thinner. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a lot greater screen density.
LG V35 ThinQ has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery size. The Xiaomi Mi A3 has a much better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.