Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-24 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Cyber shade |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A3 is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a general score of 79.2 against 75.8. Even when the Xiaomi Mi A3 and nubia Red Magic 3S were released only a few months apart, the Xiaomi Mi A3 is thinner and lighter. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Mi A3 has older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a better pixel density, a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bigger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 24% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.