Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-07-24 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A3 has a score of 79.2, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X2 Neo's global score of 77.7. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi A3 has the newer 11 version while OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, so it gives some extra features and performance enhancements. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Mi A3 is an older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a little larger screen. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality photos and videos and a larger camera aperture for better photos in low light environments.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo's battery duration is just as good as Xiaomi Mi A3's battery performance, although the OPPO Find X2 Neo has just 4025mAh battery size against 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.