Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-24 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Mi A3, having an 83.8 score against 79.2. Although the Galaxy A50 and the Xiaomi Mi A3 were released with only 4 months difference, the Galaxy A50 is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A3. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit larger display. Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much better video definition, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 has a battery life that's just as good as the battery life in Xiaomi Mi A3, although the Galaxy A50 has a 1 percent smaller battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.