Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is much better than Xiaomi Mi A3, having a overall score of 90.7 against 79.2. The Galaxy A52 design has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi A3, but it is a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit larger display and more pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy A52 features a better memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A52 has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also has a much more megapixels back camera and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A52 features a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 12% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.