Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-24 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi A3 is slightly better than Galaxy A70, getting a 79.2 score against 76.9. These phones come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi A3 has the newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it gives you some extra features and better performance. Xiaomi Mi A3's body is a little lighter but just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A70, and both of them were released only a few months apart.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A70 has a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a bit bigger screen, a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a better screen density.
Xiaomi Mi A3 has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality pictures.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.