Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-07-24 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi A3's global score of 79.2. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold and the Xiaomi Mi A3 were only released 2 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Fold design is notably heavier but also somewhat thinner. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a larger display, a higher screen density and a way higher 1536 x 2152px resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold has a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity against 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.