Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-07-24 | -- |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.13 ounces | -- |
| Blue, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi A3, having an 82.6 score against 79.2. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version and Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11 version. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a way thinner and noticeably lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Mi A3.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a greater display density, a bit bigger screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Xiaomi Mi A3 has a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a way better video quality, a much larger camera sensor and a back facing camera with a better 50 mega-pixels resolution. Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 count with very similar battery durations, although the Samsung Galaxy S25 has just 4000mAh of battery size instead of 4030mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.