Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi A3's score of 79.2. Galaxy S7's design is lighter and just a bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi A3, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Galaxy S7 has a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a much better screen density.
The Xiaomi Mi A3 features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also has 4 more CPU cores. Xiaomi Mi A3 captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Xiaomi Mi A3 has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Mi A3 features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4030mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.