Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-07-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 282 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi A3, getting an 80.1 score against 79.2. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11 version, so it offers some nice extra features and enhanced performance. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is notably thicker and extremely heavier than the Xiaomi Mi A3.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot higher pixel quantity per display inch. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi A3. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Mi A3 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 12% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.