Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-24 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 282 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi A3's global score of 79.2. Both devices we compare here include the same Android 11 operating system. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's design is notably heavier and somewhat thicker than Xiaomi Mi A3. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a little larger display, a higher screen pixel density and a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi A3. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. Xiaomi Mi A3 features a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi A3 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures, a much higher (4K) video quality and a lot better 48 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.