Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-07-24 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Gray and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4030mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xiaomi Mi A3's global score of 79.2. Although Galaxy Z Flip and the Xiaomi Mi A3 were only released 7 months apart, Galaxy Z Flip's body is somewhat thinner but just a little heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11, counting with a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
Galaxy Z Flip has a brighter screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2636, a little bit bigger display and a much greater pixel density. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Mi A3 counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4030mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.