Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| 2017-06-01 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.04 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2's score of 77.5. IPhone X's construction has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, but it is somewhat lighter. The iPhone X has a better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a higher quantity of pixels per screen inch.
IPhone X features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The iPhone X features a superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a way better battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5300mAh battery capacity. IPhone X features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting worse quality images, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the iPhone X also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments and higher video frame rate.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.