Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Just black |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2's overall score of 77.5. Google Pixel 4a is a incredibly newer and noticeably lighter phone than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, although it's just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 4a has a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4a has a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 4a also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture, a camera with a higher 12.2 MP resolution and a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 69 percent bigger battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a is more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.