Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.44 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 295.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 344 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.04 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a score of 87.5 against 77.5. Google Pixel 4a 5G's construction is much newer and way lighter, but also just a little thicker than the Xiaomi Mi Max 2. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel amount in each inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Mi Max 2 also has an external memory slot that supports up to 128 GB. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a way larger aperture for better photos in low-light environments.
Xiaomi Mi Max 2 counts with a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5300mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 4a 5G costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.